Secondary

Task management – Why leaders need to respect the limits of staff capacity

Comical photo of irritated, besuited man holding an alarm clock

If leaders demand the completion of valueless tasks, teachers have the right to concentrate on more pressing priorities, says Adam Boxer…

Adam Boxer
by Adam Boxer

Annette is a new head of history and has been asked to produce a curriculum roadmap for the subject in KS3.

The roadmap is supposed to be in full colour, have icons for each topic and show the links between the various sub-topics. She hasn’t a clue where she’s going to find the time to do it.

Surface features

This isn’t an unfamiliar scenario. In recent years, workload in many schools has seen a slight reduction in expectations around data and marking, and a pivot towards curriculum-related projects. This work is often crucial – departments without a clearly structured curriculum, or a long-term plan for learning and retrieval practice, need to make immediate changes.

But not all of this curriculum-generated work is welcomed. Some has little, if any, effect on student outcomes, and bears worrying similarities with old accountability measures that only ever focused on surface features of lessons, rather than substantive questions of student learning.

Annette is feeling the brunt of this. She has a million things to do before breakfast – arrange cover, analyse Y8 assessment scores, prepare a Y9 unit of work that went inexplicably missing, deal with three students who didn’t attend detention and speak to two parents fretting about whether their Y11 children will finish the course in time for mocks.

And that’s all before she even has the chance to think about her own classes and planning, or her steadily growing pile of essay marking…

A static sector

Annette isn’t sure why she’s been asked to produce a curriculum roadmap, as she doubts that any students (or colleagues) will even read it. She knows it will take a long time, and yet she already has a perfectly serviceable list of topics the department uses across KS3.

She’s aware that Ofsted apparently now care a lot about curriculum; that her school has recently appointed a new assistant head for curriculum impact; and that the head of English – who’s practically perfect in every way – has already produced a beautiful, full colour curriculum map that currently adorns the English corridor.

Annette has many tasks to carry out, each with varying timescales and deadlines, and isn’t convinced by their utility. At a fundamental level, she hasn’t the time to execute them all to a good standard.

She’s worried, frustrated and concerned that people will doubt her competence or work ethic. She takes work home, causing her evenings and weekends to become dominated by work she neither enjoys nor values.

Annette is far from alone. Her story is replicated in schools across the country, and nobody is immune. Senior leaders, middle leaders, frontline teachers and LSAs can all quickly become tangled in an ever-tightening net of work, with easy solutions hard to come by.

We can’t magic more time, money or colleagues. We’re a static sector in that we have what we have, and stuff needs to get done. Or does it?

Beyond capacity

What if… said stuff didn’t get done? What if that curriculum roadmap never gets written? What difference would it make to the students? What’s the purpose behind the activity, and who does it help?

If the answers to those questions are unsatisfactory, then Annette simply shouldn’t do it. Not out of bloody-minded belligerence, but simply because she’s already at capacity.

We shouldn’t be asking teachers to go beyond their capacity. They have a finite amount of time; the jobs they’re assigned should fill that time, but go no further. Asking more of them when they’re at capacity isn’t just mean, it’s counterproductive.

You’ll soon find Annette’s resignation letter on your desk as she seeks employment elsewhere. Annette shouldn’t have been asked to do this task. And now that she has, Annette should not do this task.

If she’s challenged on not having done the work, she should simply say, “I’m struggling with my workload at the moment. I do not currently have the time to do this. Please let me know if you can meet with me to look at my current to-do list and help me remove things so I have time to do the curriculum map.

If the response isn’t supportive, she should get cracking on that resignation letter – because there are plenty of schools out there that will value her more.

Adam Boxer (@adamboxer1) is a science teacher and co-founder of the online quizzing tool Carousel Learning; he blogs about education research and evidence informed teaching at achemicalorthodoxy.wordpress.com

You might also be interested in...